Publicaciones Clínicas y de Investigación

PUBLICACIONES CLÍNICAS Y DE INVESTIGACIÓN MOTIVA®

TECNOLOGÍA DE SUPERFICIE: SmoothSilk® / SilkSurface®

TECNOLOGÍA DE SUPERFICIE: SmoothSilk® / SilkSurface®
Atlan M, Nuti G, Wang H, Decker S, Perry TA. Breast implant surface texture impacts host tissue response. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. Dec 2018; 88:377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.035

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Barr S, Hill EW & Bayat A. Functional biocompatibility testing of silicone breast implants and a novel classification system based on surface roughness. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017 Nov;75:75-81; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.030

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Barr S, Hill EW, Bayat A. Novel Proteomic Assay of Breast Implants Reveals Proteins with Significant Binding Differences: Implications for Surface Coating and Biocompatibility. Aesthet Surg J. August 2018; 38(9):962–969. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy018

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Cappellano G, Ploner C, Lobenwein S, Sopper S, Hoertnagl P, Mayerl C, et al. Immunophenotypic characterization of human T cells after in vitro exposure to different silicone breast implant surfaces. PLoS ONE 2018;13(2):e0192108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192108

 
LIBRE ACCESO
James G, Boegli L, Hancock J et al. Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Textured Breast Implant Shell Materials. Aesth Plast Surg. 2019 Apr; 43:490–497. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1234-7

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, et al. The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):837-849. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801c

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, et al. The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):837-849. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801

 
LIBRE ACCESO

TECNOLOGÍA DE GEL: ProgressiveGel™ PLUS® y ULTIMA®

TECNOLOGÍA DE SEGURIDAD Q INSIDE®

RESULTADOS CLÍNICOS CON IMPLANTES MOTIVA®

RESULTADOS CLÍNICOS CON IMPLANTES MOTIVA®
Chacón M, Chacón M, Fassero J. Six-Year Prospective Outcomes of Primary Breast Augmentation with Nano-Surface Implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;39(5):495-508. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy196

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Gunnarson JL, Thomsen JB. Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1931; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001931

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Huemer GM, Wenny R, Aitzetmüller MM, Duscher D. Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141(6):831e-842e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004367.

 
ACCESO RESTRINGIDO
Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G et al. Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant. Aesth Surg. J. 2019 May, 39(3):S95-S102. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz054

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Sforza M, Spear S, Hammond D. The 21st Century Silicone Breast Implant. J Surg Open Access 2016;2(4). doi: 10.16966/2470-0991.e107

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Sforza M, Zaccheddu R, Alleruzzo A et al. Preliminary 3-year evaluation of experience with SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva silicone breast implants: a single-center experience with 5813 consecutive breast augmentation cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38(Suppl 2):S62-S73. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx150

 
LIBRE ACCESO
Sim, HB. Revisiting Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: Indications and Refinements, Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39(5):NP113-NP122. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy294

 
ACCESO RESTRINGIDO