Publications cliniques et recherche

RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE & PUBLICATIONS CLINIQUES MOTIVA®

TECHNOLOGIE DES SURFACES : SmoothSilk® / SilkSurface®

TECHNOLOGIE DES SURFACES: SmoothSilk® / SilkSurface®
Ananias MPF, Munhoz AM, Chala LF et al. Breast MRI in Motiva®️ implants with Q Inside Safety Technology™️: patient safety, and imaging features in breast reconstruction. Poster presented at: ECR Congress 2020. Poster Number: C-14673. Available at: https://epos.myesr.org/poster/esr/ecr2020/C-14673

 
LIBRE ACCES
Atlan M, Kinney B, Perry TA. Intra- and Inter- Shell Roughness Variability of Breast Implant Surfaces. Aesthet Surg J. Apr 2020; 40(5): NP324-NP326. Doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz369

 
LIBRE ACCES
Atlan M, Nuti G, Wang H, Decker S, Perry TA. Breast implant surface texture impacts host tissue response. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. Dec 2018; 88:377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.035

 
LIBRE ACCES
Barr S, Hill EW & Bayat A. Functional biocompatibility testing of silicone breast implants and a novel classification system based on surface roughness. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017 Nov;75:75-81; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.030

 
LIBRE ACCES
Barr S, Hill EW, Bayat A. Novel Proteomic Assay of Breast Implants Reveals Proteins with Significant Binding Differences: Implications for Surface Coating and Biocompatibility. Aesthet Surg J. August 2018; 38(9):962–969. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy018

 
LIBRE ACCES
Cappellano G, Ploner C, Lobenwein S, Sopper S, Hoertnagl P, Mayerl C, et al. Immunophenotypic characterization of human T cells after in vitro exposure to different silicone breast implant surfaces. PLoS ONE 2018;13(2):e0192108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192108

 
LIBRE ACCES
James G, Boegli L, Hancock J et al. Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Textured Breast Implant Shell Materials. Aesth Plast Surg. 2019 Apr; 43:490–497. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1234-7

 
LIBRE ACCES
Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, et al. The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):837-849. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801c

 
LIBRE ACCES
Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, et al. The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):837-849. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801

 
LIBRE ACCES
Stillaert F, Lannau B, Van LanduytK, Blondeel P The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants Plastic ReconstructiveJournalGlobal Open 2020 doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002966

 
LIBRE ACCES

TECHNOLOGIE DU GEL: ProgressiveGel™ PLUS® et ULTIMA®

TECHNOLOGIE DE SÉCURITÉ Q INSIDE®

RÉSULTATS CLINIQUES MOTIVA IMPLANTS®

RESULTATS CLINIQUES MOTIVA IMPLANTS®
Chacón M, Chacón M, Fassero J. Six-Year Prospective Outcomes of Primary Breast Augmentation with Nano-Surface Implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;39(5):495-508. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy196

 
LIBRE ACCES
Gunnarson JL, Thomsen JB. Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1931; doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001931

 
LIBRE ACCES
Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G et al. Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant. Aesth Surg. J. 2019 May, 39(3):S95-S102. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz054

 
LIBRE ACCES
Sforza M, Spear S, Hammond D. The 21st Century Silicone Breast Implant. J Surg Open Access 2016;2(4). doi: 10.16966/2470-0991.e107

 
LIBRE ACCES
Sforza M, Zaccheddu R, Alleruzzo A et al. Preliminary 3-year evaluation of experience with SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva silicone breast implants: a single-center experience with 5813 consecutive breast augmentation cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38(Suppl 2):S62-S73. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx150

 
LIBRE ACCES